References

Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.

Antaki, C. (1998). Identity ascriptions in their time and place: ‘Fagin’ and ‘the terminally dim’.  In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk.  London: Sage.

Antaki, C., & Wetherell, M. (1999).  Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1 (1), 7-27.

Auburn, T., Lea, S. & Drake, S. (1999). ‘It’s your opportunity to be truthful’: Disbelief, mundane reasoning and the investigation of crime.  In. C. Willig (Ed.). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological investigations.  Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Billig, M. (1991). Ideologies and beliefs. London: Sage.

Buttny, R., & Jensen, A.D. (1995).  Telling problems in an initial family therapy session: The hierarchical organization of problem-talk.  In G.H. Morris & R.J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Clarke, V., Kitzinger, C. & Potter, J. (Forthcoming).  Lesbian and gay parenting and talk about bullying.

Davis, C. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8, 44-74.

Drew, P. & Heritage, J.C. (Eds.) (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings.

Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.

Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think?  Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children’s talk.  Cognition and Instruction, 11 (3 & 4), 207-225.

Edwards, D. (1994).  Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation.

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211-247.

Edwards, D. (1995).  Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28 (4), 319-50.

Edwards, D. (1997).  Discourse and cognition.  London: Sage.

Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use.  In C.

Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds).  Identities in talk.  London: Sage.

Edwards, D.  (1999). Emotion discourse.  Culture & Psychology, 5 (3), 271-291.

Edwards, D.  (2000a). Analysing racial discourse: A view from discursive psychology.  In H.

van den Berg, H. Houtcoup-Steenstra, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Analyzing interviews on racial issues: Multidisciplinary approaches to interview discourse.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, D. (2000b).  Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral.  Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23 (4), 347-373.

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N.M. (1987).  Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom.  London:  Routledge.

Edwards, D., Middleton, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Toward a discursive psychology of remembering. The Psychologist, 5, 56-60.

Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992a). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992b). The chancellor’s memory: Rhetoric and truth in discursive remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 187-215.

Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution.  Psychological Review, 100, 23-41.

Frith, H. & Kitzinger, C (1998). ‘Emotion work’ as a participant resource: A feminist analysis of young women’s talk-in-interaction. Sociology, 32, 299-320.

Gill, R. (1993).  Justifying injustice: Broadcasters’ accounts on inequality in radio.  In E. Burman & I. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. London: Routledge.

Harré, R., & Parrott, W.G. (1996).  The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions. London: Sage.

Hepburn, A., (2000). Power lines: Derrida, discursive psychology and the management of accusations of school bullying. British Journal of Social Psychology, **, **-**.

Heritage, J.C. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.

Heritage, J.C., & Watson, D.R. (1980). Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analyzed.  Semiotica, 30, 245-62.

Locke, A.J.C., & Edwards, D. (Forthcoming).  Bill and Monica: Motive and emotion talk in Clinton’s Grand Jury testimony.

Lynch, M. & Bogen, D. (1996). The spectacle of history: Speech, text, and memory at the

Iran-Contra hearings.  Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

MacMillan, K., & Edwards, D.  (1999). Who killed the princess? Description and blame in the British press. Discourse Studies, 1 (2), 151-174.

McKinlay, A. & Dunnett, A. (1998). How gun-owners accomplish being deadly average.  In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds). Identities in talk.  London: Sage.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom.  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.) (1990). Collective remembering.  London: Sage.

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations.  In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27, 85-111.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, A.M. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction.  London: Academic Press.

Pomerantz, A.M. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims.  Human Studies, 9, 219-229.

Potter, J. (1996a). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

Potter, J. (1996b). Attitudes, social representations, and discursive psychology.  In M. Wetherell, (Ed.)  Identities, groups and social issues.  London: Sage.

Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluations, European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233-266.

Potter, J., Edwards, D. & Wetherell, M. (1993). A model of discourse in action, American Behavioural Scientist, 36, 383-401.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour.  London: Sage.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1988). Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourse. Text, 8, 51-68.

Puchta, C. & Potter, J. (Forthcoming). Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of attitudes, British Journal of Social Psychology.

Schegloff, E.A. (1997). Whose text?  Whose Context?, Discourse and Society, 8, 165-187.

Speer, S. & Potter, J. (Forthcoming). The discursive construction of ‘heterosexist’ talk: Participant resources in the management of (potentially) prejudiced claims.

te Molder, H. (1999). Discourse of dilemmas: An analysis of communication planners’ accounts.  British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 245-263.

Wetherell, M. & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation.  London: Harvester.

Widdicombe, S. & Wooffitt, R. (1995).  The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action.  Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

Wieder, D.L. (1974). Telling the code.  In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethnodology (pp. 144-172).  Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

Wieder, D.L. (1988).  From resource to topic: Some aims of conversation analysis. In J.

Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook II. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wooffitt, R. (1992).  Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

Contact

Discourse and Rhetoric Group (DARG)
Department of Social Sciences
Loughborough University Loughborough
Leicestershire LE11 3TU
UK 

Citation

EDWARDS, D. and POTTER, J., 2001. Discursive psychology. IN: McHoul, A.W. and Rapley, M. (eds.) How to analyse talk in institutional settings: a casebook of methods. London: Continuum, pp. 12 – 24.

Copyright License

• Title: “Discursive psychology”
• Authors: “Derek Edwards, Jonathan Potter”
• Source: “https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/”
• License: “CC BY-NC-ND 4.0”